K 22
Full Member
Posts: 117
|
Post by K 22 on Jun 14, 2012 9:49:38 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by James Fujita on Jun 14, 2012 15:14:50 GMT -8
I've often thought that the definition of "L.A." is very fluid.
So for that matter is the definition of "public transportation."
We could surpass New York City by including San Bernardino BRT in our calculations.
It wouldn't make getting around any easier.
|
|
|
Post by thanks4goingmetro on Jun 15, 2012 15:58:12 GMT -8
There could be more rapid transit routes in Los Angeles, but it ultimately will be a different beast (BRT, LRT, HRT) and LA land use needs serious reform for it to have the intended long term impact. 202 miles of track is roughly double what we have and it still would come out to fewer actual "lines" on the map, but already the tracts of density are already becoming connected and served by rapid transit
|
|
|
Post by jdrcrasher on Jun 15, 2012 17:02:37 GMT -8
50 years from now, i'd believe it.
|
|
|
Post by RMoses on Jun 18, 2012 10:11:15 GMT -8
50 years from now, i'd believe it. The over/under is more like 150 years.
|
|
|
Post by thanks4goingmetro on Jun 18, 2012 11:12:53 GMT -8
Those Communists in Beijing and Shanghai make it look so easy to build
|
|
|
Post by Elson on Jun 22, 2012 21:55:27 GMT -8
Those Communists in Beijing and Shanghai make it look so easy to build In China, "Communism" is spelled, "Communi$m."
|
|