|
Post by Gokhan on Feb 24, 2015 11:23:09 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by bzcat on Feb 24, 2015 11:54:47 GMT -8
Metrolink as an organization, doesn't really place any emphasis on passenger safety. The priority is always on ease of operation. This train probably left Oceanside yard in a pull configuration and so when it reach Oxnard to begin its service run, it is "backwards". Unless Metrolink invest in locomotive turntable at all the terminals, there is no easy fix.
|
|
|
Post by Gokhan on Feb 24, 2015 12:41:18 GMT -8
One way is that they could use a redundant engine on the other end of the train. Otherwise, they would have to build a rail loop at the end of the line.
|
|
|
Post by johanragle on Feb 24, 2015 20:18:30 GMT -8
Metrolink as an organization, doesn't really place any emphasis on passenger safety. The priority is always on ease of operation. This train probably left Oceanside yard in a pull configuration and so when it reach Oxnard to begin its service run, it is "backwards". Unless Metrolink invest in locomotive turntable at all the terminals, there is no easy fix. Metrolink always backs their trainsets in to Union Station from what I've seen. Outbound trains are led by the locomotive, inbound trains are led by the passenger cab. Once Metro and Metrolink get around to building SCRIP, then we'll probably see some switched-up trainsets since they'll be able to run straight through. One way is that they could use a redundant engine on the other end of the train. Otherwise, they would have to build a rail loop at the end of the line. And now we're back to extra operational costs for having to lug the weight of a useless locomotive around, just in case some bumpkin gets their vehicle stuck on the tracks. I wonder if the rail loops might be cheaper in the long run. I'd argue that we could use more grade separation, particularly in high traffic areas, but Oxnard is practically as remote as it gets and I don't think SCRRA could scrounge up enough funds to grade separate every crossing, even with the guaranteed (not!) cooperation of all the cities involved.
|
|
|
Post by johanragle on Feb 25, 2015 12:03:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by johanragle on Feb 25, 2015 13:45:16 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by tramfan on Feb 26, 2015 12:29:04 GMT -8
One way is that they could use a redundant engine on the other end of the train. Otherwise, they would have to build a rail loop at the end of the line. Or a "Y" which might be cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by johanragle on Feb 26, 2015 12:55:55 GMT -8
|
|