|
Post by bluelineshawn on Feb 6, 2011 7:53:48 GMT -8
ruh roh. A weeks worth of posts are missing.
|
|
|
Post by metrocenter on Feb 6, 2011 8:40:45 GMT -8
I know it's been a quiet week...but not *that* quiet!
|
|
|
Post by jeisenbe on Feb 6, 2011 11:12:04 GMT -8
I had posted to note the installation of a TAP-card dispensing TVM at Rosa Parks station.
(I hate the system behind this forum; properly backing-up the archives should be the first priority of the forum administrator. I wish we could move to a different forum provider)
|
|
|
Post by metrocenter on Feb 23, 2011 12:46:24 GMT -8
Metro staff has been hard at work on a project to integrate fare collection across the region (between Metro and the munis), based on stored value on TAP cards. The following item, detailing the status of the project, will be presented at the February 2011 Metro Board meeting, which will happen tomorrow. This is the first time I've seen any details of the planned integration. It looks very promising. www.metro.net/board/Items/2011/02_February/20110224RBMItem3.pdf
|
|
|
Post by James Fujita on Feb 24, 2011 18:44:15 GMT -8
the munis are to Los Angeles transit what all of the private railways (and even JR Yamanote and Chuo) are to Tokyo transit. we need to get them on board (and get them to get over their "New World Order"-esque phobias ), and regional fare collection is a very positive step in that direction.
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on Sept 11, 2011 12:14:22 GMT -8
According to this months TAP Update the turnstiles at four stations will be locked by October. Hollywood/Western, Vermont/Beverly, Wilshire/Normandie, and Wilshire/Western.
|
|
|
Post by mattapoisett on Sept 11, 2011 18:52:06 GMT -8
According to this months TAP Update the turnstiles at four stations will be locked by October. Hollywood/Western, Vermont/Beverly, Wilshire/Normandie, and Wilshire/Western. Also it looks like Big Blue Bus has retrenched further from being willing to accept TAP.
|
|
|
Post by macross287 on May 12, 2012 13:17:49 GMT -8
Metro is apparently going cold turkey with the gate locking implementation. They are going to require everyone who uses Metro Rail and the Orange line to have a functioning TAP cards loaded with stored value or passes. The TVMs are also being modified to allow loading of a single $1.50 one way fare. www.metro.net/board/Items/2012/05_May/20120516EMACItem30.pdf
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 12, 2012 14:37:03 GMT -8
Not exactly "cold turkey". It will still be phased and they want to have all of the red/purple line stations locked by November. No mention of the other lines. Also, it looks like the cost of the reusable TAP card will be reduced to $1 from $2.
The one thing that confuses me about TAP is transferring between train lines. Are you really supposed to TAP? Are riders with a pass on their TAP card that transfer from the purple line to the red line supposed to leave the platform, exit the station, TAP, and then return?!?
And if TAP is supposed to reduce the need for fare checkers, what's to stop people from riding two trains on one fare? They'll still need to check tickets either on trains or at transfer stations. Or maybe the thinking is that at least the fare evaders have probably paid something.
|
|
|
Post by mattapoisett on May 12, 2012 22:24:47 GMT -8
The one thing that confuses me about TAP is transferring between train lines. Are you really supposed to TAP? Are riders with a pass on their TAP card that transfer from the purple line to the red line supposed to leave the platform, exit the station, TAP, and then return?!? And if TAP is supposed to reduce the need for fare checkers, what's to stop people from riding two trains on one fare? They'll still need to check tickets either on trains or at transfer stations. Or maybe the thinking is that at least the fare evaders have probably paid something. Yes, you are supposed to TAP. They offer card reading pylons near the top of the stairs between the Blue/Expo lines and the Red line. There are similarly placed pylons at the Green/Blue line station. I also think I remember seeing them at Wilshire/Vermont. Metro will need fare checkers, but probably not where the gates are locked on a single line and they can concentrate on transfer stations and unregulated stations. How they tell is, if you bought a single segment ticket at La Brea which you show the sheriff at say Mission Station, the sheriff will know you we not paying the fare for the Gold Line and probably the Red too. If you have a TAP Card, the Sheriff has readers which can tell what type of ticket/pass you have and the last time you tapped.
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 13, 2012 8:48:59 GMT -8
I always TAP between the blue and green, red/purple and gold and blue and red/purple because the TAP stations are visible and accessible. I don't know where they are for purple/red transfers. I don't make that transfer very often but I know that I have never tapped when doing do.
But if they really want everyone to TAP between the blue and red/purple they need more tap stations. At least half the people do not tap as they are hard to get to when crowded.
|
|
|
Post by James Fujita on May 13, 2012 20:21:28 GMT -8
The way that Metro fares are structured right now, lots of TAPping and potentially confusing transfer TAP situations are going to be inevitable. (I've always TAPped for transfers, but I can see how people could be confused.) The real problem isn't the number of pylons or the number of gates but the way that the fare system is set up. Steve Hymon said on the Source a few days ago that he didn't see distance-based fares happening. But this whole problem of having enough TAP pylons for transfers seems to point to the need for a better solution. A TAP-in when you arrive at a station and TAP-out when you leave would make sense — even if the fare was still based on $1.50 for each individual ride. If a person TAPs at Universal City and doesn't TAP again until Long Beach Transit Mall, $3. Red-Blue-Green $1.50 x 3 = $4.50. The fare would max out with a $5 day pass. The TAP technology should be able to handle such a system.
|
|
|
Post by rayinla on May 14, 2012 12:08:42 GMT -8
A TAP-in when you arrive at a station and TAP-out when you leave would make sense — even if the fare was still based on $1.50 for each individual ride. If a person TAPs at Universal City and doesn't TAP again until Long Beach Transit Mall, $3. Red-Blue-Green $1.50 x 3 = $4.50. The fare would max out with a $5 day pass. The TAP technology should be able to handle such a system. Buses and the rail system in Queensland, Australia work exactly this way (caveat: the fares are distance based) and there's a real incentive to "TAP" out: if you don't TAP upon exiting, the system assumes you've traveled the entire line and deducts accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by bzcat on May 14, 2012 15:01:50 GMT -8
TAP uses the same system and software as London's Oyster card so we know distance based fare and tap-out is not beyond the limitation of the system. London's rail system fare is distance based (by zone) but the buses are flat charge like LA (you tap in only, no need to tap out) but you get free transfers if you tap out of Tube and tap in to a bus within 45 minutes (or something like that). It's transparent and easy to understand.
We can convert Metro's rail (and bus way lines) to a zone system without much difficulty. Most of the zone changes also coincide with line changes right now so if we have free transfers within the sterile area.
|
|
|
Post by James Fujita on May 15, 2012 18:06:10 GMT -8
Has anybody noticed the announcement that LADOT will be getting TAP in June? Apparently the new buses will have TAP readers, can't find info. if this is just DASH or also the Commuter Express buses.
|
|
|
Post by macross287 on May 15, 2012 19:17:46 GMT -8
I believe I read somewhere that LADOT was installing just the validators for TAP on their buses, like what AC Transit and VTA in San Jose have on their buses www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tH5y2xeEhQ . They still intend on using their old fare-boxes for cash customers
|
|
|
Post by James Fujita on May 15, 2012 23:50:26 GMT -8
It's still a step in the right direction if TAP users will have access to LADOT.
From the press release: For riders who usually pay CASH, you'll be able to add "stored value" to your TAP card and begin using it in June.
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 26, 2012 11:12:55 GMT -8
The way that Metro fares are structured right now, lots of TAPping and potentially confusing transfer TAP situations are going to be inevitable. (I've always TAPped for transfers, but I can see how people could be confused.) The real problem isn't the number of pylons or the number of gates but the way that the fare system is set up. Steve Hymon said on the Source a few days ago that he didn't see distance-based fares happening. But this whole problem of having enough TAP pylons for transfers seems to point to the need for a better solution. A TAP-in when you arrive at a station and TAP-out when you leave would make sense — even if the fare was still based on $1.50 for each individual ride. If a person TAPs at Universal City and doesn't TAP again until Long Beach Transit Mall, $3. Red-Blue-Green $1.50 x 3 = $4.50. The fare would max out with a $5 day pass. The TAP technology should be able to handle such a system. You TAP between the red and purple lines?!? How do you do that? You go back to the mezzanine, exit the turnstiles and return? Steve Hymon doesn't even know and is replying in the turnstile locking thread on the source as to the correct procedure. So far he says that he thinks that you have to TAP between all rail lines except red/purple. As far as Steve Hymon, he said that he was asked if Metro would go to distance based fares and lower fares for short trips and he doesn't think that fares will ever be lowered. He stops short of saying that the distance based part won't happen, and in fact says that Metro will likely look at it in a few years. I seem to recall one of the LACMTA board members mentioning distance based fares several years ago when talking about the turnstiles and I got the impression that was likely where they wanted to head at some point.
|
|
|
Post by spokker on May 27, 2012 21:14:30 GMT -8
Are you supposed to TAP if you have a day/week/monthly pass? I understand you must tap once to activate it, but once you activated it, tapping is superfluous. Actually, what I really want to know is if you get a ticket for not tapping?
|
|
|
Post by Elson on May 28, 2012 12:46:43 GMT -8
Are you supposed to TAP if you have a day/week/monthly pass? I understand you must tap once to activate it, but once you activated it, tapping is superfluous. Actually, what I really want to know is if you get a ticket for not tapping? Yes you do need to TAP. Once the turnstiles are locked, your TAPs will open them. And if you ride a bus, the driver has no way of knowing you tapped it previously, duh. Dunno if you get a ticket (you will if you pass is invalid) but you'd get a warning. Eventually people's TAPs equate into ridership figures.
|
|
|
Post by erict on May 28, 2012 19:15:06 GMT -8
I can't seem to find the place to "tap" when you are transferring from the blue/expo line to he red line, does none know? The ones upstars say "blue line" on them...maybe it makes no difference?
I also noticed that with the tap system, you have no idea if you can stop along a line, say to grab a coffee, and then come back on the same route going the same direction. Do you need to tap again?
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by ieko on May 28, 2012 19:57:46 GMT -8
I can't seem to find the place to "tap" when you are transferring from the blue/expo line to he red line, does none know? The ones upstars say "blue line" on them...maybe it makes no difference? I also noticed that with the tap system, you have no idea if you can stop along a line, say to grab a coffee, and then come back on the same route going the same direction. Do you need to tap again? Thanks It's by the stairs, you always were required to TAP/buy a new ticket if you entered/exited
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 28, 2012 20:22:24 GMT -8
Are you supposed to TAP if you have a day/week/monthly pass? I understand you must tap once to activate it, but once you activated it, tapping is superfluous. Actually, what I really want to know is if you get a ticket for not tapping? Yes you do need to TAP. Once the turnstiles are locked, your TAPs will open them. And if you ride a bus, the driver has no way of knowing you tapped it previously, duh. Dunno if you get a ticket (you will if you pass is invalid) but you'd get a warning. Eventually people's TAPs equate into ridership figures. I'd say that it's more that you're supposed to TAP rather than that you "need" to. I say that only because if you forget to TAP and have a day pass there is no penalty and afaik you can't even be ticketed for fare evasion since you paid your fare. But one basic thing that I didn't know for a long time was that after buying a day pass you have to TAP. I always figured that when you TAP the second time on the TVM that would activate the day pass, but it doesn't. It's probably not an issue at most stations, but at the station that I usually use (Willow), the TVM's are actually past the TAP pylons and you have to backtrack to TAP.
|
|
|
Post by Elson on May 29, 2012 2:41:57 GMT -8
I can't seem to find the place to "tap" when you are transferring from the blue/expo line to he red line, does none know? The ones upstars say "blue line" on them...maybe it makes no difference? I also noticed that with the tap system, you have no idea if you can stop along a line, say to grab a coffee, and then come back on the same route going the same direction. Do you need to tap again? Thanks It's by the stairs, you always were required to TAP/buy a new ticket if you entered/exited Yeah, that's there. The problem is having to tap between Red and Purple; there's no provision to do that whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by spokker on May 29, 2012 17:43:56 GMT -8
On the subject of tapping between Red and Purple lines, Steve Hymon mention on The Source that you do not have to tap between the different segments of the Orange Line when the Chatsworth extension opens (e.g. traveling from Chatsworth to Warner Center during midday). I wonder if the same is true of Red and Purple. And will it be true of the whole system the Downtown Regional Connector creates? Yes you do need to TAP. Once the turnstiles are locked, your TAPs will open them. And if you ride a bus, the driver has no way of knowing you tapped it previously, duh. Dunno if you get a ticket (you will if you pass is invalid) but you'd get a warning. Eventually people's TAPs equate into ridership figures. Clearly, when the fare gates are locked, you will tap to gain entrance. And the bus is an obvious scenario. What I am asking is that if you do not tap, possibly because you are not riding a bus and entering a station without fare gates, will you get a ticket? I don't know how ridership figures come into play as far as the rider is concerned. The rider does not work for Metro and has no responsibility to count riders or be counted. This is why ticket sales and other passive counting systems do the job of counting riders. I also do not like that TAP saves your trip history. I would be very uncomfortable using the service. Anyway, we all know what the answers should be to these questions, but we also want to avoid the inefficiencies of the giant bureaucracy.
|
|
|
Post by ieko on May 29, 2012 20:46:50 GMT -8
On the subject of tapping between Red and Purple lines, Steve Hymon mention on The Source that you do not have to tap between the different segments of the Orange Line when the Chatsworth extension opens (e.g. traveling from Chatsworth to Warner Center during midday). I wonder if the same is true of Red and Purple. And will it be true of the whole system the Downtown Regional Connector creates? Yes you do need to TAP. Once the turnstiles are locked, your TAPs will open them. And if you ride a bus, the driver has no way of knowing you tapped it previously, duh. Dunno if you get a ticket (you will if you pass is invalid) but you'd get a warning. Eventually people's TAPs equate into ridership figures. Clearly, when the fare gates are locked, you will tap to gain entrance. And the bus is an obvious scenario. What I am asking is that if you do not tap, possibly because you are not riding a bus and entering a station without fare gates, will you get a ticket? I don't know how ridership figures come into play as far as the rider is concerned. The rider does not work for Metro and has no responsibility to count riders or be counted. This is why ticket sales and other passive counting systems do the job of counting riders. I also do not like that TAP saves your trip history. I would be very uncomfortable using the service. Anyway, we all know what the answers should be to these questions, but we also want to avoid the inefficiencies of the giant bureaucracy. From a planners point of view... I want you as the customer to TAP everywhere, really. Because right now the biggest hole in our data sets are travel patterns, sure I can tell you how many people are boarding and alighting, but to be honest.. this data is somewhat useless. Why? Because the data currently forces us to infer trip patterns rather than to actually know them, granted it's not terrible -- but it's like going from using Google Maps to plan complex transit trips to using several bus schedules. Data is not something you need to be afraid of, frankly there are too many of you for me to care where you as an individual are going, I want to know where groups of people are going and when -- but to me those people can be just a bunch of numbers on the screen. I can't stress this enough, the better data we have, the better decisions we can make. It's in everyone's interest for planners to have good data. For the Red/Purple line TAP issue, it doesn't really make sense to try and TAP between the two unless you're at Wilshire/Vermont, but even then it's no big deal. What really matters is when the lines split, those are hoardings for that line. Metro currently counts the shared segment as "heavy rail" in its internal reports, and then also has a split count for the lines in the shared and unshared segment as well.
|
|
|
Post by matthewb on May 30, 2012 0:37:46 GMT -8
On the subject of tapping between Red and Purple lines, Steve Hymon mention on The Source that you do not have to tap between the different segments of the Orange Line when the Chatsworth extension opens (e.g. traveling from Chatsworth to Warner Center during midday). I wonder if the same is true of Red and Purple. And will it be true of the whole system the Downtown Regional Connector creates? Clearly, when the fare gates are locked, you will tap to gain entrance. And the bus is an obvious scenario. What I am asking is that if you do not tap, possibly because you are not riding a bus and entering a station without fare gates, will you get a ticket? I don't know how ridership figures come into play as far as the rider is concerned. The rider does not work for Metro and has no responsibility to count riders or be counted. This is why ticket sales and other passive counting systems do the job of counting riders. I also do not like that TAP saves your trip history. I would be very uncomfortable using the service. Anyway, we all know what the answers should be to these questions, but we also want to avoid the inefficiencies of the giant bureaucracy. From a planners point of view... I want you as the customer to TAP everywhere, really. Because right now the biggest hole in our data sets are travel patterns, sure I can tell you how many people are boarding and alighting, but to be honest.. this data is somewhat useless. Why? Because the data currently forces us to infer trip patterns rather than to actually know them, granted it's not terrible -- but it's like going from using Google Maps to plan complex transit trips to using several bus schedules. Data is not something you need to be afraid of, frankly there are too many of you for me to care where you as an individual are going, I want to know where groups of people are going and when -- but to me those people can be just a bunch of numbers on the screen. I can't stress this enough, the better data we have, the better decisions we can make. It's in everyone's interest for planners to have good data. For the Red/Purple line TAP issue, it doesn't really make sense to try and TAP between the two unless you're at Wilshire/Vermont, but even then it's no big deal. What really matters is when the lines split, those are hoardings for that line. Metro currently counts the shared segment as "heavy rail" in its internal reports, and then also has a split count for the lines in the shared and unshared segment as well. On the Paris tramways, they also have a "TAP" style system. In the metro and RER, you almost always have to tap to get the gate to open. You have to tap to exit about half the time. There are sensors just inside the doorways of the trams, and there is clear signage indicating that you should tap even if you have an unlimited pass. Some of the signs further say that it is important to tap because they need to collect ridership numbers. If Metro has good ridership numbers, they can better plan service levels, and can make a much better case to taxpayers and the federal government to maintain existing levels of funding, and to pay for extensions to the system. Spokker, you may be a customer, but you are a subsidized customer. Regardless of this fact, when you make a contract with a service provider, governmental or private, you take on responsibilities in addition to receiving a service. In this case, you are required to pay your fare, tap your card, not eat on the trains, follow the instructions of Metro employees, etc. Ieko, the data in passenger counts, etc., though available in a table, is as useful as Google transit to someone with data mining expertise since it's in a convenient computerized format. One famous example of the success of data mining is realizing that lots of people were buying beer and diapers at the same time. The store that discovered this from their sales records arranged their shelves to make it easier to buy both and increased sales. Years later, Netflix, Amazon, and pretty much all other retailers use these techniques to organize stores and make recommendations. Having aggregate statistics that large numbers of people are making certain kinds of trips (ideally starting and ending points) would be hugely useful when planning services and effectively informing the public about these services. Knowing if these patterns are changing would also be very useful.
|
|
|
Post by rayinla on May 30, 2012 11:54:49 GMT -8
From a planners point of view... I want you as the customer to TAP everywhere, really. Because right now the biggest hole in our data sets are travel patterns, sure I can tell you how many people are boarding and alighting, but to be honest.. this data is somewhat useless. Why? Because the data currently forces us to infer trip patterns rather than to actually know them, granted it's not terrible -- but it's like going from using Google Maps to plan complex transit trips to using several bus schedules. Data is not something you need to be afraid of, frankly there are too many of you for me to care where you as an individual are going, I want to know where groups of people are going and when -- but to me those people can be just a bunch of numbers on the screen. I can't stress this enough, the better data we have, the better decisions we can make. It's in everyone's interest for planners to have good data. Similarly, I've never understood why Metro, the County or the City of Los Angeles has never (to the best of my knowledge) undertaken a survey of businesses to find out where their employees who drive to work are driving from. While it wouldn't provide route information (although probabilities could be inferred), it would certainly yield valuable information about where mass transit (or roadway improvements) would be most effective.
|
|
|
Post by spokker on May 30, 2012 12:22:58 GMT -8
You won't get good data on travel patterns because users are not required to tap out. The sensors that are at the doors of trains are already sufficient. Spokker, you may be a customer, but you are a subsidized customer. Subsidized or not, I can still choose not to use the service if I am not happy with its policies. I am happy to pay my fare, not eat on the train, but I am not happy about tapping and fare gates. I do not want to be tracked throughout the system. I do not want my whereabouts saved to a server somewhere. I opt out of online tracking where I am able and I will opt out of TAP tracking by not using the service. If the BRU really cared about riders, they would be using some of that environmental justice crap to protect the privacy of public transit users. At the very least, the data should be anonymized where it is not and strict laws should require a warrant for police to pull any information off a TAP card or TAP servers. I don't know and cannot find the answers to these issues. Until they are resolved, I will not be using the service. But what I am most angry about with TAP is the $1-$2 charge riders must pay for a card that does not go to improved service, but goes to Cubic to make these stupid cards that add zero-value. It might even be rent seeking in some respects. What Cubic did was manipulate the political environment of public transit, not to create new wealth, growth or opportunities, but to extract wealth that has already been created (taxpayer funding and card fees). TAP (not much more useful than paper tickets and passes, and adds a whole host of problems), fare gates (cost more than they will "save") and Cubic are simply parasites on the Metro system. A good blog post from the Bay Area on privacy concerns: www.munidiaries.com/2011/06/10/what-does-your-clipper-card-say-about-you/
|
|
|
Post by antonio on May 30, 2012 15:00:33 GMT -8
Spokker, remaining anonymous is easy. Just only ever buy and load up your TAP card with cash. Don't register it online. With no money trail, theres no info about you. You are a just a card. Carry a double in case a cop ever tries to confiscate your TAP. No need to be so paranoid. Also, if police can do that without a warrant then we have far more serious problems than just TAP.
|
|