|
Post by joshuanickel on Jul 9, 2014 8:20:09 GMT -8
The big blue bus has come up with some preliminary recommendations that they would like input on in regards to how to service expo when it comes to Santa Monica. Here is the link to the survey where they will show each line with the proposed headways and length of service: Big Blue Bus Expo Proposal SurveySome of the proposals: Take a look at the survey it is very interesting and gives alot of detail.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Wentzel on Jul 18, 2014 8:55:14 GMT -8
Great survey. Some of the proposals are really interesting.
I suggested some tweaks on several of the lines.
The two major flaws I see initially are:
First, Cutting the 2 and the 3 and the 8 from UCLA. I think that is too much reduction to just leave UCLA and Westwood with the 1 and the 12 only. While the new configuration for the 8 is interesting, I just foresee the transfer traffic from the Westwood stop between Expo and UCLA will be too much for the 12 to handle on its own. Cutting off the 2 on the east didn't make sense either. Maybe it can head down Westwood to the Expo Line for those who will take Expo for points west on Wilshire.
The other is reducing the Local 7 to thirty minutes runs apart. You've got to be kidding me. The Local 7's are already stuffed like sardine tins during rush hour by people who use the LOCAL service. There is heavy demand for local service on Pico. Once again it just makes me think that Big Blue Blus is over its head and cannot handle the heavy demand on Pico Blvd, and I wonder if BBB should just let Metro provide the local and rapid service on Pico east of Westwood.
|
|
|
Post by bzcat on Jul 18, 2014 9:59:43 GMT -8
Regarding Line 2/3/8 not going to UCLA, I think the issue is congestion on Westwood Blvd is forcing much longer run times on BBB buses. If you eliminate Line 2 and 8 on Westwood Blvd but increase Line 1 and 12 headways (as BBB is proposing), you can probably move more people with fewer resources in a set amount of time on this corridor. This of course assumes you can transfer for free at Westwood/Wilshire and Westwood/National. The added cost of extra boarding is the real problem here in my opinion, not so much a capacity issue. But fortunately, UCLA staff and students can already transfer for free (if they have Bruin Go!). Line 3 to UCLA is a typically low ridership via San Vicente so I don't see much impact here.
As for Line 2 going south to Expo, I don't think it is necessary. People heading east from downtown and midtown Santa Monica can already take 720 or Rapid 7, and both will likely be faster to Wilshire/Western than taking the long detour on Line 2 to reach Expo. BBB wants to simplify its network into grids so this kind of dogleg running is counter to their goal of providing higher capacity on major routes. I much rather they use the resources to add the new N-S bus on Barrington and Walgrove (as BBB is proposing).
Line 7 going down to 30 minutes is not great but not a total disaster. The real issue here is the size of the bus, not necessarily headway. If Local 7 is operated with 60 ft bus, I think the overcrowding will ease. Along the same line, for BBB's new plan to work, 12/Rapid 12 will probably need 60 ft buses all day. Right now, BBB doesn't even have enough 60ft bus to operate Rapid 7 and Rapid 3 all day so this is an issue.
And I'm VERY surprised that BBB is not planning to increase headway on Bundy/Line 14. Line 14 will become very important for phase 2 (like Rapid 12 has since Expo phase 1 opened).
|
|
|
Post by masonite on Jul 18, 2014 10:14:20 GMT -8
And I'm VERY surprised that BBB is not planning to increase headway on Bundy/Line 14. Line 14 will become very important for phase 2 (like Rapid 12 has since Expo phase 1 opened). I was too, but they are adding a Barrington bus that stops at Expo/Bundy so in effect that does provide additional service for the corridor since Barrington and Bundy are not far apart.
|
|
elray
Junior Member
Posts: 84
|
Post by elray on Oct 9, 2014 10:33:09 GMT -8
Was nagged today to take the survey.
Imagine my surprise to find ... Big Blue is up to their same old tricks. I guess given their response on the $7 million un-bench program, I should not be.
They're looking, once again, to dramatically cut local service, even worse than the last time. Proposing 30-minute headways on Local 7's.
Even worse, they're proposing to terminate Local 3 service on Manchester and via Sepulveda. Their suggestion? "Take the Metro 115 and/or the Culver City 6".
Since when is reduced service, longer walks and multiple forced transfers an improvement in mobility? Somehow I guess it serves Expo, but what about the transit patron?
So glad we bought a car...
|
|
|
Post by bzcat on Oct 9, 2014 17:35:42 GMT -8
Was nagged today to take the survey. Imagine my surprise to find ... Big Blue is up to their same old tricks. I guess given their response on the $7 million un-bench program, I should not be. They're looking, once again, to dramatically cut local service, even worse than the last time. Proposing 30-minute headways on Local 7's. Even worse, they're proposing to terminate Local 3 service on Manchester and via Sepulveda. Their suggestion? "Take the Metro 115 and/or the Culver City 6". Since when is reduced service, longer walks and multiple forced transfers an improvement in mobility? Somehow I guess it serves Expo, but what about the transit patron? So glad we bought a car... I'm glad you are not in charge of planning bus service... You want local buses to go everywhere all the time but you probably also one of those people that will bark endlessly if fare has to go up to pay for those low performing local routes. The reason Local 7 headway reduction is being proposed is because BBB believe more people will be taking Expo to reach West LA and Santa Monica rather than endure the slow Metro 30 and a forced transfer at Rimpau. It's a very plausible outcome and thus you plan to allocate the resource to meet the projected ridership. Reducing Local 7 to match the lower demand is logical and shifting the resources over to Rapid 7 will improve reliability and reduce bus bunching. The people that uses Local 7 between Rimpau and Downtown Santa Monica are currently getting a free ride in higher frequency because of the transfer volume at Rimpau to SMC. If transfer volume shrinks (I would use the term "collapse") after Phase 2 opens, BBB will need to set the frequency to the nature demand on this corridor. Also, there is a big problem on Pico with the size of the bus. Pico at the current 12 minutes headway for Local 7 results in crazy bus bunching during rush hour. Reducing headway but using bigger bus is one way to address this problem. Local 3 on Manchester is one of those marginal part of the network that doesn't add a lot of value. It has low boarding and not likely to grow. If ridership elsewhere on the Lincoln corridor continues to grow, it's wise to shift the resources to serve more people more of the time. I'm kind of on the fence with this one... BBB leaving Manchester is a true downgrade (unlike the Local 7, which is just matching service to likely demand).
|
|
|
Post by Gokhan on Oct 10, 2014 11:03:47 GMT -8
I gave up on the Big Blue Bus long time ago. Long headways and frequently absent buses easily turn a 1-mile trip to an hour or more. Metro should take over the Big Blue Bus.
|
|
|
Post by LAofAnaheim on Oct 11, 2014 15:01:38 GMT -8
At one time, Big Blue Bus was one of the "better managed" bus agencies in Los Angeles County. However, once Metro moved to TAP and got real-time train/bus arrival information with Nextbus...........that perception has changed.
BBB still refuses to sign on to TAP and there is no real-time information available for potential riders.
At least with Metro NextBus, you know when your bus/train is arriving, and that is the best information you need when using public transit.
|
|
|
Post by joshuanickel on Oct 11, 2014 19:45:58 GMT -8
At one time, Big Blue Bus was one of the "better managed" bus agencies in Los Angeles County. However, once Metro moved to TAP and got real-time train/bus arrival information with Nextbus...........that perception has changed. BBB still refuses to sign on to TAP and there is no real-time information available for potential riders. At least with Metro NextBus, you know when your bus/train is arriving, and that is the best information you need when using public transit. Big blue bus announce at a community meeting earlier this year in July that the tap validators (like long beach) are coming next year and they had just started talks with nextbus to be a part of that system.
|
|
|
Post by transitfan on Oct 13, 2014 7:12:34 GMT -8
I gave up on the Big Blue Bus long time ago. Long headways and frequently absent buses easily turn a 1-mile trip to an hour or more. Metro should take over the Big Blue Bus. Not that that would ever happen, but if it did, that would solve MTA's Division 6 problem. They could just move from the current location on Main St & Sunset Av to the BBB yard The routes might be trickier. For the BBB 1, they could just extend some MTA line 4 trips to Venice. The 2, I guess divert some line 20 trips into the VA. The 7, extend some line 30 trips to Santa Monica (that would be a looooooooooooonnnng route, though. Maybe short turn those trips somewhere in downtown L. A. The other routes, I'd have to look at it. Anyway, probably not happening, if anything, MTA may try to dump the 534 onto BBB if it only runs Santa Monica-Malibu after Expo Phase 2 opens.
|
|
|
Post by joshuanickel on Dec 10, 2014 17:53:54 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by bzcat on Jul 24, 2015 10:07:12 GMT -8
Looks like BBB is going to implement some of the route changes even before Expo line opens. This new Line 14 stop is located in Playa Vista (Bluffcreek @ Campus Center Dr).
|
|
|
Post by joshuanickel on Jul 24, 2015 16:45:21 GMT -8
Looks like BBB is going to implement some of the route changes even before Expo line opens. This new Line 14 stop is located in Playa Vista (Bluffcreek @ Campus Center Dr). All of the changes will be implemented in four phases beginning On August 23rd. The remaining changes will happen in February, June, and August of next year. There will also be a fare change at some point next year where the fare is proposed to go up to $1.25, but that is not finalized yet. Here is an overview of the four different phases: Big Blue Bus - The Evolution of Blue has begunHere is a more detailed look at the August Service Changes: Big Blue Bus - Service Changes Planned for August 23, 2015
|
|
|
Post by joshuanickel on Aug 14, 2015 11:17:51 GMT -8
|
|