|
|
Post by jejozwik on Aug 4, 2008 21:28:26 GMT -8
|
|
simon
New Member
Posts: 24 
|
Post by simon on Aug 4, 2008 23:30:34 GMT -8
Wow, this one actually manages to load slower than the old one. Not to mention the actual map part seems to be smaller and more congested.
I appreciate that they're trying to ... well I don't really know what they're trying to do, but I like the previous map a lot better. This one is so congested and seems to completely eliminate the actual shape of the city. in the previous one when you stood back from it, you could really see the shape of the city and its sections. This one, every single section is just so congested it looks like some sort of demented puzzle game.
|
|
joequality
Junior Member
Bitte, ein Bit!
Posts: 88
|
Post by joequality on Sept 17, 2008 7:52:13 GMT -8
I like the new rail maps they put up that have the specific Metrolink stations, rather than just generic lines
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Walker on Sept 17, 2008 16:49:10 GMT -8
I like the new rail maps they put up that have the specific Metrolink stations, rather than just generic lines
New rail maps? Where? Where?Ohhhh. Metro has some of those at Union Station. Older versions of the Metro Rail maps used to have all the Metrolink stations shown in the context of the Metro Rail system. Yet now, the version posted at all the other Metro stations and available online doesn't show the Metrolink stations. A step backward, methinks. |
|
