|
|
Post by Jason Saunders on May 22, 2009 10:25:10 GMT -8
What hear ye?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gokhan on May 22, 2009 10:51:34 GMT -8
I would say change it so that it has less grade separation. How come you didn't have it in the vote options?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Saunders on May 22, 2009 11:10:04 GMT -8
I would say change it so that it has less grade separation. How come you didn't have it in the vote options? You know I thought of that as soon as I pressed submit. |
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 22, 2009 12:18:14 GMT -8
They obviously don't have a fixed policy for grade separation. If they did they wouldn't need to hold meetings to determine whether the regional connector should be grade separated or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by metrocenter on May 22, 2009 12:47:12 GMT -8
I think the standard is pretty well-documented. The problem is that people frequently disagree with the results produced by these standards. In some cases, it is because they disagree with the standard, and in other cases it is because they think the standard is being used in an unfair way.
Personally, I have no fundamental problem with changing the standard to require more grade separations for future projects. The problem with changing the standard is that people along existing projects would claim that they were excluded from the new policy, due to discrimination or racism, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by bluelineshawn on May 22, 2009 16:18:31 GMT -8
I've seen many posts on this forum regarding their policy for grade separating intersections, but I don't see that as the same thing. And even that only sets the minimum requirements. That doesn't prevent them from doing more than the minimum if they want, so that's not a policy.
|
|
